Avoid listing multiple names of genes (or proteins) separated by a slash, as in 'Oct4/Pou5f1', as this is ambiguous (it could mean a ratio, a complex, alternative names or different subunits). This usually happens if there are a lot of papers for which the reviews have already come in before yours. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made 110 Soc., 2016, 138, 8356-8359, , [CDATA[> A PDF has been built, either by you or by the editor, that requires your approval to move forward. waiting to send decision to author npj. The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Serum Response . So don't worry if its taking a long time: its just how the process works. The Editors then make a decision based on the Reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities: (a) Accept, with or without editorial revisions (b) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached (c) Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission (d) Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Meeting abstracts that are not published and papers in preparation should be mentioned in the text with a list of authors (or initials if any of the authors are co-authors of the present contribution). All referees agree to these conditions before the journal sends them a manuscript to assess. Authors must ensure that their Methods section includes adequate experimental and characterization data necessary for others in the field to reproduce their work. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. We strive to ensure that the diversity of our Reviewers reflects that of the broad scientific community, in terms of gender, ethnicity/race, geographic location and career stage. Online material: Three errors are particularly common: Multiple comparisons: When making multiple statistical comparisons on a single data set, authors should explain how they adjusted the alpha level to avoid an inflated Type I error rate, or they should select statistical tests appropriate for multiple groups (such as ANOVA rather than a series of t-tests). You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. Sometimes, this can take anywhere between 2-6 weeks. In these cases, authors must provide evidence of identity based on sequence (when appropriate) and mass spectral characterization. All npj Series journals are guided by the Nature Portfolio editorial peer review policy. Preprint archives do not compromise novelty. J. The npj Series journals use standard Nature referencing style. Please consult the appropriate nomenclature databases for correct gene names and symbols. References are numbered sequentially as they appear in the text, methods, tables, figure legends. For molecular dynamics trajectories, at least the initial and final configurations should be supplied. Resubmit for Review: This will require the Author to make major changes and another round of review will need to take place.. How do I check the status of my manuscript? If a related manuscript is submitted elsewhere while the manuscript is under consideration at npj Precision Oncology, a copy of the related manuscript must be sent to the Editor. The corresponding author is notified by e-mail when the Editor decides to send a paper for review. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. Lawmakers stay in their lanes on Supreme Court abortion pill ruling Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. 0, , To post social content, you must have a display name. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision Data availability statements should be provided as a separate section after the Methods section before the References, under the heading "Data Availability". Any data necessary to evaluate the claims of the paper that are not available via a public depository should be provided as Supplementary Information. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Authors are permitted to post the final, published PDF of their article on a website, institutional repository or other free public server, immediately on publication. PLOS ONE is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. Manuscripts submitted to the npj Series journals do not need to adhere to our formatting requirements at the point of initial submission; formatting requirements only apply at the time of acceptance. Authorship Criteria Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to each of the three components mentioned below: Concept and design of study or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. [CDATA[> Collections and special issues follow the standard peer review policy. waiting to send decision to author npj The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. After acceptance, changes to the manuscript may be made so that papers conform to our style. The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? How to write an appeal letter | Springer Nature Protocols and Methods All authors read and approved the final manuscript. In cases where the referees' concerns are more wide-ranging, Editors will normally reject the manuscript. Data availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required for multiple datasets): The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [insert name of repository] repository, [insert persistent URL to datasets]. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. Code availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required): The underlying code [and training/validation datasets] for this study is available in [repository name] and can be accessed via this link [insert persistent URL to code]. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. 31010402000380, , editor@medsci.cn. In today's Big Idea, author Christian Klaver invites us to take a look into the magical world he created for his book-loving daughter. Article titles should be in Roman text, the first word of the title should be capitalized and the title written exactly as it appears in the work cited, ending with a full stop. I think it seems a long time for this step. There is a waiver policy for these charges. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information, such as conflicts of interest, and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. [CDATA[// > 0, , Use symbol font for Greek letters. Editorial decision making and the peer review process. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Units should have a single space between the number and the unit, and follow SI nomenclature (for example, ms rather than msec) or the nomenclature common to a particular field. | The journals operate under a collaborative editorial model, with active researchers engaged as manuscript-handling Editors, supported by in-house, PhD-trained Nature Portfolio managing Editors. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. The peer review of any submissions for which the Editor has a competing interest is handled by another Editor who has no competing interests, to ensure that the evaluation of these submissions is completely objective. The Editor contacts the author with the decision. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be held to rigorous standards with respect to experimental methods and characterization of compounds. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Use of the word "significant" should always be accompanied by a P value; otherwise, use "substantial," "considerable," etc.